Lawyerin a digitallegal project

We are launching a hybrid online legal service: an AI assistant, a knowledge base, legal documents, and live lawyer consultations where automation is not enough.

The offer has been open for:

0days
6hours
24minutes
12seconds

pommeDeTerre is responsible for the product and technical side: website, interface, development, automation, packaging, promotion, advertising budget, and first user acquisition.

The lawyer is needed for the legal foundation of the project: methodology, knowledge base, document quality, live consultations, risk assessment, and clear language for users.

01.

This is an early stage, but not an abstract idea to try someday. The project has a launch strategy, an agreed promotion budget, and a clear goal: to build a legal direction around a strong expert.

02.

The partnership model for the selected candidate is 33% of the project net profit. Scope of responsibility, profit calculation, reporting, and participation terms are fixed in an agreement.

About Us And The Project

pommeDeTerre helps launch digital products: user journeys, interfaces, automation, websites, packaging, and promotion. In this project we combine our product and technical side with the legal expertise of a partner.

We are building a digital legal service where automation helps people understand a typical situation faster, prepare documents, and see the next step. When a case requires proper legal judgment, the user should move to a live consultation with a lawyer.

The first outcome of the lawyer’s work will be the legal core of the product: a map of scenarios, boundaries of safe automation, first documents, consultation rules, a base of standard answers, and quality standards.

02

Jurisdiction And Starting Areas

At the start, the project is focused on Russian law. The first areas will be selected from typical civil-law and consumer situations. The exact scope will be agreed with the lawyer. It is important for us to define not only what the product does, but also where it must not go without a specialist. At the start, we do not automate complex criminal, tax, corporate, bankruptcy, migration, or other high-risk matters without dedicated expertise.

  • consumer protection;
  • claims, complaints, applications;
  • returns and disputes with sellers or services;
  • everyday civil-law situations;
  • basic employment issues;
  • simple contractual and pre-trial scenarios.

Why thiscan be interesting?

We are looking for a lawyer who wants to help build a legal direction from an early stage: not only review documents, but also influence the product, consultations, quality, public trust, and development strategy.

( 001 )

On our side - product, development, website, automation, packaging, promotion, and first users.

( 002 )

On the lawyer’s side - law, methodology, documents, consultations, risks, and quality.

( 003 )

The point of the role is not to “help developers with legal texts”. The point is to build a working legal service together: clear for users, legally careful, and capable of becoming a full online practice over time.

Partnershipmodel andfuture role

We are not looking for a freelancer for one-off documents, but for a partner for the legal side of the project.

( 001 )

The lawyer’s partnership share is 33% of the project net profit. Net profit means project revenue minus pre-agreed direct expenses. The exact list of expenses, accounting, reporting, payouts, scope of responsibility, and participation terms are fixed in an agreement.

( 002 )

The project perspective is to grow a full legal direction with its own team. In this model, the lawyer becomes not just a manager, but a leader-partner: we combine product, development, website, automation, promotion, and user acquisition with their legal expertise, methodology, consultations, and quality control.

( 003 )

Later, the legal side can expand: new lawyers, team training, review of complex cases, quality standards, task distribution, and public development of the direction.

What The Lawyer Will Do

This is not only an AI product. We are building a hybrid legal service: automation helps with typical scenarios, while the lawyer is responsible for methodology, quality, automation boundaries, and live consultations where a person needs a full review.

We need a lawyer who can think not only as a consultant, but also as a product expert: see the user journey, understand AI limitations, ask the right questions, stop unsafe scenarios, and turn legal complexity into clear actions.

The work will include:
  1. 01

    helping build the product’s legal knowledge base: case categories, rules, sources, checklists, standard documents, and limitations;

  2. 02

    describing legal scenarios: what questions to ask the user, which facts matter, and which documents are needed in different situations;

  3. 03

    defining the boundaries of safe automation: what the service can prepare and what must be escalated to a lawyer consultation;

  4. 04

    reviewing AI answers and documents for legal accuracy, completeness, and risky wording;

  5. 05

    helping formulate product rules: when to ask follow-up questions, when to offer a document, and when to warn about risks;

  6. 06

    participating in templates and structures for claims, complaints, applications, and lawsuits;

  7. 07

    translating legal complexity into clear language for users;

  8. 08

    taking part in selective quality control after launch;

  9. 09

    running live consultations where an automated scenario is not enough;

  10. 10

    helping update legal logic when laws or practice change.

06

AI Boundaries And Legal Safety

AI in the project does not replace a lawyer and must not automatically make legally significant decisions for the user.

The lawyer helps define:

  • where the service can give standard information and prepare a document;
  • where additional questions are needed;
  • where the user must be warned about risks;
  • where automation must stop and transfer the user to a live consultation.

We pay special attention to disclaimers, personal data, confidentiality, proper consultation setup, and the responsibilities of the parties.

Who We Are Looking For

Preferably a 3rd-year-or-above law student, graduate, or young lawyer. Earlier is possible if you are confident in your preparation and already know how to work with legal sources and legal logic. The year of study is not the main criterion: preparation level and thinking matter more.

We need someone who:

  • studies at a strong law school or independently maintains a high level;
  • confidently works with laws, court practice, and legal sources;
  • can read legal rules and draw careful conclusions;
  • writes legally accurately, but in clear human language;
  • sees risks and does not promise a 100% result;
  • knows how to ask the right clarifying questions;
  • understands that law is not only rules, but real-life situations;
  • has a live interest in law and a willingness to deeply understand user problems;
  • wants to grow into a public expert role;
  • is interested in products, automation, and new formats of legal help.

We evaluate thinking, responsibility, writing quality, and interest in developing the direction.

This is not a format for someone who simply wants a quiet seat in a finished system. It requires a builder’s mindset: seeing the opportunity, taking responsibility, participating in the product, building trust, and gradually turning expertise into an independent legal direction.

08

Participation Format

First we get acquainted and discuss the project, expectations, and the possible role of the lawyer. After that, we may give a short legal case to understand approach, legal logic, and language.

If there is a fit, we separately agree on the partnership format: scope, regularity, responsibility, 33% of the project net profit, profit calculation, and entry terms.

Full-time is not expected at the start. The role is designed as a reasonable workload that can be combined with studies, work, or practice.

At the acquaintance stage we look at:

  • how close we are in approach;
  • how the candidate works with legal logic;
  • whether they can explain complex things simply;
  • whether they see risks in documents and scenarios;
  • whether they are interested in developing a hybrid legal service: AI, documents, and live consultations.
09

Agreements

If we decide to work together, we fix the agreements in writing:

  • participation format and regularity;
  • lawyer’s scope of responsibility;
  • boundaries of consultations and document review;
  • process for working with the knowledge base and AI scenarios;
  • partnership share of 33% of the project net profit;
  • net profit formula, expenses, reporting, and payouts.

This gives both sides clear rules from the start: what we are building, who is responsible for what, and how the project economics work.

10

Who It Fits And Who It Does Not Fit

This format is a fit if you are interested not just in doing legal tasks, but in helping build a legal direction from zero.

A fit if you:

  • want to influence how a legal product is built;
  • can balance legal accuracy with clear language for ordinary users;
  • are ready to understand new formats of legal help: AI, knowledge base, documents, consultations;
  • are comfortable with an early stage where not all processes are already written down;
  • want to develop personal expertise and eventually become the face of the legal direction;
  • are ready to be responsible for quality, not just “look over a document”;
  • see interest in a partnership model and growing together with the project.

Not a fit if:

  • You currently need the most predictable format: a fixed salary from day one, a ready flow of clients, a strict job description, and tasks fully defined by someone else.
  • Also not a fit if you only want one-off documents without involvement in the product, consultations, quality, and development of the direction.
11

Selection Process

#1

Application

Tell us about yourself: where you study or work, which areas of law are closer to you, and whether you have experience with claims, complaints, lawsuits, consultations, or legal writing.

#2

Conversation

We discuss the format, expectations, workload, interest in the project, and how you see your role.

#3

Mini Case

We give a short legal case to understand your approach: structure, questions, risks, logic, and language.

#4

Call

If there is a fit after the case and conversation, we discuss the role, possible tasks, legal limitations, and collaboration format.

#5

Agreements

If we decide to work together, we fix the participation format, responsibility, partnership share, profit calculation, and payout terms.

12

What To Write In The Application

No long cover letter is needed. Briefly tell us:

  • who you are and how to contact you;
  • where you study or work;
  • what legal tasks you have already dealt with;
  • which areas of law are closer to you;
  • why the format of AI, documents, and live consultations in one legal service interests you.

If you have a CV, a legal writing sample, or a short case breakdown, attach a link. If not, just tell us about yourself in the message.